Breast medical oncologist Abirami Sivapiragasam (Abi Siva), M.D., shared her perspective on the recent American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) conference.
ASCO 2026: Four Studies I'm Still Thinking About
ASCO 2026 highlighted two parallel themes in breast cancer. On one side, we are becoming more comfortable de-escalating therapy when biology suggests treatment can be safely avoided. On the other, we continue to push for better options in metastatic disease where outcomes remain suboptimal. Four studies stood out to me.OPTIMA addressed one of the most important questions in early ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer: who truly needs chemotherapy? The study enrolled 4,429 clinically high-risk patients, including those with up to nine positive lymph nodes, and compared standard chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy with a PAM50-guided approach. Patients with a PAM50 score ≤60 received endocrine therapy alone. Remarkably, 68% of patients in the biomarker-guided arm avoided chemotherapy. Five-year invasive breast cancer-free survival was nearly identical between groups (90.4% vs 91.5%; HR 0.99), meeting the noninferiority endpoint. These results are encouraging, but I remain cautious. Follow-up is relatively short for ER-positive disease, and only 19% of patients had N2/N3 disease.
VIKTORIA-1 was one of the most important metastatic presentations. In patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, PIK3CA-mutant disease previously treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor and aromatase inhibitor, the triplet of gedatolisib, fulvestrant, and palbociclib doubled median PFS compared with alpelisib plus fulvestrant (11.1 vs 5.6 months; HR 0.50). The doublet regimen performed similarly and both appeared to have less hyperglycemia than alpelisib. The main limitation is the requirement for weekly IV therapy.
PANKU-Breast02 delivered encouraging results for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. The EGFR×HER3 bispecific ADC iza-bren improved both progression-free and overall survival compared with physician's choice chemotherapy in previously treated patients. Median PFS improved by 5.4 months and OS by 3.4 months. It is exciting to see a bispecific ADC achieve both PFS and OS benefit in TNBC, though confirmation in broader global populations will be important given the study was conducted entirely in China.
Finally, a large retrospective GLP-1 analysis suggested approximately a 30% lower incidence of breast cancer among overweight women using GLP-1 receptor agonists. While intriguing, this remains hypothesis-generating. The study cannot separate the effects of the medication from the benefits of weight loss and could not account for several important breast cancer risk factors. Prospective studies are clearly needed.
Together, these studies remind us that progress in breast cancer comes from both smarter treatment selection and continued innovation for patients with advanced disease.
Recent stories
MUSC News + Enterprise
Inside MUSC’s first-of-its-kind Inherited and Metabolic Liver Disease Clinic
Cancer Prevention + Melanoma and Skin Cancer
First new sunscreen ingredient approved in decades could strengthen skin cancer prevention efforts
MUSC News + Womens Health
Robotic-assisted outpatient surgery a ‘game-changer’ for GYN care in Pee Dee